Marc’s Posts

May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Media missing the mark.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011 @ 09:03 AM

It’s several days into the election and the media are still harping on the same issues of who said what several years ago –  it’s  clear that no message is going to catch on because the media only want to concentrate on  who thinks who is a liar!  This is shameful!

Comments Off on Media missing the mark.

Interesting article in the Toronto Star:

http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/410418

Federally owned Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. is no longer pursuing the sale of its next-generation nuclear reactor in the United Kingdom, announcing yesterday it will focus its energy on capturing business at home.

Some industry critics said AECL, which says it has spent “less than $10 million” trying to snag a purchase from the U.K., is trying to soften the blow of a certain loss and how it might be perceived as it bids for contracts in Canada.

“Why let it blow up later when you can back out now and save some face?” said Shawn-Patrick Stensil, who closely follows the nuclear power sector for Greenpeace Canada.

Less than two weeks ago, Mississauga-based AECL announced that its Advanced Candu Reactor made it onto a short list of four reactor designs approved by the U.K. nuclear regulator, which said it found no safety or security shortfalls serious enough to rule out the Canadian design. The short list also included Areva NP, Westinghouse Electric Co. and GE Nuclear – the same companies currently being considered for a new reactor in Ontario.

At the time, the U.K. government said it would whittle the list to three designs sometime in May. Sources say the regulator sent letters to all the U.K. utilities asking them to rank the designs they preferred. Their responses still left AECL on the bottom of the list.

Hugh MacDiarmid, AECL’s president and chief executive officer, told the Toronto Star that a business decision had to be made.

“We’ve been very carefully evaluating our realistic prospects over there. How much money is it going to cost us to go through step three, how much time, and without any commitment at the end of that?” he said. “Our sense was that we were unlikely to get the blue ribbon this time around, because we didn’t have the demonstration project under way here in our home country.”

MacDiarmid said the U.K. plans to build several new reactors and that AECL intends to participate in subsequent rounds, once it has proven itself in Canada.

With three opportunities to sell in Canada – in Ontario, New Brunswick and Alberta – the Crown corporation didn’t want to spread itself too thin, he added.

“I’m a real believer in having a core mission in life, and I believe AECL’s core mission is to be the supplier of choice to the Canadian electrical utility market. Everything else has to be secondary to that.”

Marc Kealey, an international energy consultant and former general manager at AECL, said the company made the right decision. The Canadian government, ultimately responsible as AECL’s owner, is better off backstopping a new nuclear project on its home turf than taking on huge financial risk in a foreign market, he said.

Even with a contract in Canada, Kealey added that AECL and its Candu technology face an uphill battle in overseas markets, dominated by the pressurized-water reactor technology used by Areva and Westinghouse.

Much of AECL’s efforts are focused on Ontario. The province expects to make a decision on reactor technology, and where the new plant will be built, by year end.

Comments Off on TorStar: AECL abandons effort to sell U.K. reactors

Election Day 3

Tuesday, March 29, 2011 @ 11:03 AM

We’re at day 3 of the election and nobody seems to want to talk about substance.  Layton is wrong, Ottawa is NOT broken, our political parties seem to be during this election.  Doesn’t anyone have anything substantive to say?

Comments Off on Election Day 3

Well done political parties!

Monday, March 28, 2011 @ 09:03 AM

Why in heaven’s name have we descended this election into a case of who’s REALLY going to form a coalition!  Can the media start asking WHAT these guys stand for?

What a ridiculous start to what should be one of the more important elections we’ll face in a long while.  WHO frigging cares about who said what in 2004!  Can’t the media start asking real questions about what these Parties vying to be government will do on issues like: Arctic Sovreignty,  Canada’s role in nuclear power generation, a greener environment, getting us out of the economic hole we’re in.

My non-political friends are telling me that no one seems to be attractive to them –  they’re feeling frustrated and may NOT vote.  Well done political parties!

Comments Off on Well done political parties!

AECL abandons effort to sell U.K. reactor

Monday, March 28, 2011 @ 08:03 AM

From the Toronto Star:

Federally owned Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. is no longer pursuing the sale of its next-generation nuclear reactor in the United Kingdom, announcing yesterday it will focus its energy on capturing business at home.

Some industry critics said AECL, which says it has spent “less than $10 million” trying to snag a purchase from the U.K., is trying to soften the blow of a certain loss and how it might be perceived as it bids for contracts in Canada.

“Why let it blow up later when you can back out now and save some face?” said Shawn-Patrick Stensil, who closely follows the nuclear power sector for Greenpeace Canada.

Less than two weeks ago, Mississauga-based AECL announced that its Advanced Candu Reactor made it onto a short list of four reactor designs approved by the U.K. nuclear regulator, which said it found no safety or security shortfalls serious enough to rule out the Canadian design. The short list also included Areva NP, Westinghouse Electric Co. and GE Nuclear – the same companies currently being considered for a new reactor in Ontario.

At the time, the U.K. government said it would whittle the list to three designs sometime in May. Sources say the regulator sent letters to all the U.K. utilities asking them to rank the designs they preferred. Their responses still left AECL on the bottom of the list.

Hugh MacDiarmid, AECL’s president and chief executive officer, told the Toronto Star that a business decision had to be made.

“We’ve been very carefully evaluating our realistic prospects over there. How much money is it going to cost us to go through step three, how much time, and without any commitment at the end of that?” he said. “Our sense was that we were unlikely to get the blue ribbon this time around, because we didn’t have the demonstration project under way here in our home country.”

MacDiarmid said the U.K. plans to build several new reactors and that AECL intends to participate in subsequent rounds, once it has proven itself in Canada.

With three opportunities to sell in Canada – in Ontario, New Brunswick and Alberta – the Crown corporation didn’t want to spread itself too thin, he added.

“I’m a real believer in having a core mission in life, and I believe AECL’s core mission is to be the supplier of choice to the Canadian electrical utility market. Everything else has to be secondary to that.”

Marc Kealey, an international energy consultant and former general manager at AECL, said the company made the right decision. The Canadian government, ultimately responsible as AECL’s owner, is better off backstopping a new nuclear project on its home turf than taking on huge financial risk in a foreign market, he said.

Even with a contract in Canada, Kealey added that AECL and its Candu technology face an uphill battle in overseas markets, dominated by the pressurized-water reactor technology used by Areva and Westinghouse.

Much of AECL’s efforts are focused on Ontario. The province expects to make a decision on reactor technology, and where the new plant will be built, by year end.

http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/410418

 

Comments Off on AECL abandons effort to sell U.K. reactor

Federal Election Update

Wednesday, March 2, 2011 @ 04:03 PM

Today federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty confirmed that the federal government will table its latest budget on March 22, 2011.

The minority Conservative government must gain the support of at least one of the three opposition parties for the budget to pass. If the government is unsuccessful in passing the budget, the government will fall as it will have “lost the confidence of the House”.

Currently both the opposition Liberals and Bloc have indicated they will not support the budget. The Liberals sticking point is the issue of continuing corporate tax cuts which they oppose at this time. The Bloc under Duceppe has indicated that they could support the budget if $2 billion in HST compensation was included. It is somewhat unlikely that this will occur although “discussions are ongoing”.

This leaves the fate of the current government in the hands of Jack Layton and the NDP.  The NDP has asked the Conservative government for four measures in the budget:

  1. Remove the HST from home heating bills and restore the EcoEnergy Retrofit program.
  2. Increase the Guaranteed Income Supplement  for low-income seniors
  3. Expand & strengthen the Canada Pension Plan
  4. Increase the number of family doctors (5 million Canadians do not have access a family doctor)

 

Following the budget being tabled on March 22, there will be a vote in the House. If all three parties vote against the budget (vote to be held within the week following the budget) then the government will be defeated.

A likely Election Day is May 02, 2011.

Recent polls have the Conservatives on the edge of majority territory. Harper’s Conservatives have polled in the high 30’s through much of February, and in the most recent poll (yesterday) Conservative support is pegged at 43%.

The recent surge in Conservative support has occurred over the last few weeks so there is some debate regarding the “depth” and “staying power” of this level of support.

New seat projections have averaged the last few polls and show seat gains for both the governing Conservatives (+9), the Bloc (+5) and declines for both the NDP (-5) and Liberals (-4) from their current seat totals.

The Conservatives remain just shy of a majority under this model.

The question is whether or not the PM wants to roll the dice on a majority. This is likely his last chance to show the Conservative base that he can deliver. If he falls short, the leadership race will commence soon after.

However, if the polls are solid, the PM has never been this close before. It may prove too tempting to resist and if that is the case, the government will not work with the NDP or Bloc and will in fact engineer its own defeat.

Over the next few weeks, watch the polls and not Jack or Gilles…it really won’t be their call!

Comments Off on Federal Election Update

I’ve had cause throughout my life to meet up with interesting people in politics, entertainment and sports.  As a baseball fan, I had the opportunity in the early 70’s to see Fergie Jenkins pitch for Chicago at, of all places, Jarry Park in Montreal.  In the mid 1980’s I worked on Fergie’s campaign when he ran for the provincial Liberals in Windsor Ontario. Although Fergie lost, his career as a baseball Hall of Famer was secured.

In the latter part of the 70’s my relative, Clem Kealey, a well known sports writer for the Sun, introduced me and many of his nephews, in the Kealey clan to new Jays like  Roy Hartsfield , the controversial first GM who recently died and, Lloyd Moseby one of the original Jays drafted in 1978.

In the early 90’s, like many in Canada, I watched the Jays win. Greats like Dave Stieb, who never got in the Hall of Fame (but should), were superstars. The Jays, it seemed were Canada’s team. I remember being in Yukon on an election campaign and managed several times to watch the Jays on TV up there too.

In the latter part of the 1990’s, I was coaching  AAA junior baseball (17 and 18 year olds) in Mississauga. We had our own version of spring training (10 days in March) in La Romana, Dominican Republic.  At their stadium, home of the Toro’s, we had the unparalleled experience of being coached by Epy Guerrero, legendary scout for the Blue Jays who brought with him Tony Fernandez.  Imagine being coached on how to hold a bat at the plate (like playing a “flute”) by the inimitable Tony Fernandez?  Magic! The boys loved it and cherish that experience to this day!

In the past couple of years, I had the honour of associating with my all-time Jays fave – Roberto Alomar.  He is one of the nicest folks I have ever met and despite his fame, is down to earth and highly attuned to his status as a major contributor to baseball.

Roberto has transitioned his career from baseball to business in a manner much different from other baseball greats.  He has not so much relied on his glory days, as he has concentrated on ensuring that young kids remain active and healthy.  His adherence to physical fitness is manifest in his sculpted frame.  Roberto appears humbled by his induction in the HOF – he remains a gentleman.  Toronto, Canada Jays fans and sports fans should be proud!

Comments Off on Baseball’s Hall of Fame inducts a Blue Jay – finally!

The sad news was received that former Liberal giant Keith Davey has died. This is big news for political types in Canada.  Davey typified Liberal politics in Canada and was the reason why many know the Liberal brand so well.

Whether it was in his role as the National Director of the Liberal Party when the “New Politics” was introduced in Canada.  When Lester Pearson (Mike) became PM in the early 60’s, it was largely recognized that the central Liberal Party figure that brought about the dramatic return to power was Keith Davey.

Davey broadened the base of support for the Party in those days, increased grass roots consultation in the Party, fixed the strained relations between the provincial and federal wings of the Party and created a process for increasing fundraising efforts for the Party.  These principles exist today and that is his legacy.

Synonymous with his roots in the Liberal Party, he was also a die-hard supporter of the Canadian Football League and Canadian baseball.

In short, Davey brought a whole bunch of fun into politics in Canada.  As a young Liberal  growing up in the seventies, I had cause to interact with the “Rain Maker” in national elections.  In the latter part of the Trudeau era, Davey was the reason why so many people like me loved “practical politics” – working in campaigns, creating effective riding associations and advising elected officials.

When I worked for former Prime Minister John Turner in the early 1980’s we fought the federal election in 1984 under Davey.  He was classic! Everyone knew we were going to get “smoked”, but he put on the toughest of skins as the Director of that campaign and motivated the hell out of all of us in the field.  In short – like everything else in which he was involved, it was fun!

He’s going be missed and we’re all blessed for having experienced his enormous presence.

Comments Off on Grateful politicos say goodbye to a real dynamo from Cell 13

Leaks and a Pause for Concern

Thursday, December 2, 2010 @ 05:12 PM

The “Wikileaks” reveal an insidious side of human nature, yet are a serious and hard-core symptom of the state of politics today.

Notwithstanding that the US is red faced over this whole ordeal, Canada’s now firmly ensconced in the matter regarding certain people, process and politicians.

What are we doing? The leaks, in my opinion, are a reaction to the absolute mistrust, anger and frustration that the average person has toward what can be characterized as “the elites”.

The issue is not that we need to hunt down who leaked the items, but why!

Think about Canada – former CSIS Director Jim Judd was a great leader in that organization, who became quite frustrated and angry about how the political process, the current cast of elected politicians, the bureaucracy, the justice system and, frankly, the media have been immature about dealing with the threats of terror in Canada.

We’re hung up, in our current political process, about being so correct as not to offend that we will, seemingly, put at risk our own safety.

As an advocate for government reform in areas like prescription medication costs and patient access to care, I have been subjected to security threats and largely they have been ignored or viewed as dramatic.

I have been intimately involved in repatriating Canadians who have been wrongly imprisoned abroad and heard snickers from Canadian politicians and media that maybe the person deserved what they got.

At the same time, I see lobbyists get advanced peeks at government announcements and rigged bids for government contracts or procurement occur time and time again.

Wow! We do this a lot in Canada. No wonder people are angry, frustrated and reactive.

Unless citizens take matters into their own hands and start to push back against this institutionalization of politics by getting active in the process, seeking democratic renewal and demanding that politicians and their bureaucrats perform better and in our collective best interests, we will most certainly continue to see these kinds of activities like leaked documents invade our falsely secure and pretty little worlds.

Comments Off on Leaks and a Pause for Concern